Guests »

Cat Johnson Braves Doll Lil’s Word Association Challenge!

August 7, 2013 – 12:48 am | One Comment

I’m back from vacation and ready to get down and dirty finding new free and amazingly bargained books for you! But first this week I have something special. I convinced super hot and crazy talented …

Read the full story »
Guests
Giveaways
News
Articles
Features
Home » Anton Strout, Authors, Blog Hop, Features, Guests, Stacia Kane

Rating Event Blog Hop: The Lovely Ms. Stacia Kane and Paperback Action Figure Anton Strout Shares an Author’s Perspective

Submitted by on March 30, 2012 – 12:00 am8 Comments

Today our 3-star rating event blog hop takes us to the other side of the story – the Author’s side! Laurie from Bitten at Paranormal Romance and WildAboutBones asked that authors share honest thoughts about receiving a 3 Star rating on their work; not what their ego feels but how they take the news of rating and what that rating means to them. So the Dolls decided we knew just who to ask…


Stacia Kane is the author of the light-hearted romantic urban fantasy “Megan Chase” series starting with PERSONAL DEMONS.

She currently writes the gritty dystopian urban fantasy “Downside” series starring Chess Putnam and featuring ghosts, human sacrifice, drugs, witchcraft, punk rock, and a badass ’69 Chevelle. She bleaches her hair and wears a lot of black.

Website | Twitter | Facebook | LiveJournal | Goodreads


 
It’s amazing how uncomfortable I feel writing this. Even commenting in a vague fashion on my feelings about reviews and ratings makes me feel really weird and scared.

But I can’t say no to the Dolls, so I’ll do my best.

Do I like getting three-star reviews? Do they make me feel good? Well, no, to be honest. They don’t upset or depress me, but they don’t exactly make me punch the air with joy, either (not that I ever actually punch the air with joy, over anything. I don’t). I mean, I don’t consider three stars to be negative, really, but I didn’t get into this business to have readers put my books down, shrug, and say, “Yeah, it was okay, I mean, it was decent but nothing really special.” I don’t think that’s any author’s dream: Hey, everyone, I’m just above mediocre! Yesss!

But the perverse thing is, I’d rather have that kind of three-star review—“It was meh” than the kind that’s rated three stars but says very, very positive things about the book, about the story, the characters, the worldbuilding and the writing, and leaves me wondering why, if everything was so good, it only got three stars? Especially when I look at that reviewer’s previous ratings and see that three stars generally is “Meh” for them, and I know that when readers look at their reviews they’ll just see the rating, assume my book was also Meh, and move on. So it’s a little…confusing, maybe. A little disheartening.

Of course I know not every book will appeal to every reader. And that’s okay; not every book appeals to me, either. Readers have the right to say whatever they want about a book, to pick it up or not, to review it or not. There’s absolutely no reason why they should take me into account when reviewing my work; none of this “You should respect the author’s hard work and it’s her heart and soul blah blah blah” garbage. My work stands on its own, and it should. And if they feel it’s just not exciting or absorbing or touching enough to give it more than three stars, that’s okay—well, they don’t need my permission, but I mean it doesn’t hurt or bother me. I’m just glad it wasn’t two or one (although I’ve gotten one or two one-star reviews that made me laugh like crazy; hey, if you can’t enjoy being called the Anti-Christ what can you enjoy?) I’m just glad they read it. And depending on what the actual review says, I may well walk away from the three-star review feeling better than I did after a five-star one (for example, no matter what the rating, I’m always pleased and gratified when a reviewer compliments the writing itself, and I’m always left a little empty when even a five-star review is only one or two sentences. Not that I’m complaining, of course).

I guess the bottom line is that a three-star review or rating is just like any other review or rating: it’s one person’s opinion. I don’t see why one person’s opinion is something to get upset over, and I don’t think an honest three-star rating is the type of rating or review to get upset over. Any review that isn’t totally positive can sting or be frustrating, depending on the day and my mood and all of that, but in general, when I see three stars I just kind of shrug and move on. Which is basically what three stars means to begin with, right?


Fantasy author Anton Strout was born in the Berkshire Hills mere miles from writing heavyweights Nathaniel Hawthorne and Herman Melville and currently lives in the haunted corn maze that is New Jersey (where nothing paranormal ever really happens, he assures you).

He is the author of the Simon Canderous urban fantasy series and Alchemystic, book one of the upcoming Spellmason Chronicles for Ace Books, a division of Penguin Group (USA). Anton is also the author of many short tales published in anthologies by DAW Books.

The Once & Future Podcast is his latest project, where he endeavors as Curator of Content to bring authors and readers together through a weekly news show format.

He has been a featured author guest of honor, speaker and workshop leader at San Diego Comic-Con, Gencon, New York Comic-Con, the Brooklyn Book Festival and many other conventions.

In his scant spare time, his is a writer, a sometimes actor, sometimes musician, occasional RPGer, and the worlds most casual and controller smashing video gamer. He currently works in the exciting world of publishing and yes, it is as glamorous as it sounds.

|Website | Facebook | Once&Future Podcast|


I Know Why The Raged Author Weeps, or How I Learned to Let Go of My Three-Star Reviews
by Anton Strout

When the Paperback Dolls invited me to write on “Three star reviews and how you react to them,” my first reaction was to cry from traumatic flashbacks. Once I uncurled from my fetal ball, however, my therapist and I decided it would be good to work out my inner demons in a manner that might help others, and… well, here we are.

While my fifth book Alchemystic is coming out this October, I’m still considered well under drinking age if we go by writer years. Since Dead To Me came out in 2008, and its three sequels—Deader Still, Dead Matter, Dead Waters—one a year after that, I’d say I’m in my teenage years as a writer. That means all the growing pains and wounds from being a published writer unleashed on the public not too long ago are still fresh.

So what does a 3-star review really mean? Well, I’m not really sure. It’s all terribly subjective, isn’t it? I have one idea, but me not knowing all of you, well, your mileage may vary. In my writerly little brainmeats, I’ve always equated 3 stars the way I do the school grading system:

A=5, B=4, C=3, D=2 F=1

So a 3-star review is a solid C. Average. Is that so bad?

And that MAY be the case when someone sets down a 3-star review, but here is where I fear my logic is deeply flawed. First of all, I have no proof that people are grading it as such. Zero. Not even anecdotal. In fact, I’ve only heard people say that 3-star reviews are what they normally give books they like well enough. Some people NEVER give 5 stars, reserving 4 stars for books that blow them away on a cosmic level. In their book, 3 is a book they liked very well. But it’s nothing provable. If I all polled you right now, would you all end up with the same definition? Doubtful.

But, as you might be beginning to suspect, authors are neurotic by nature. I see 3 stars as a C, which is mediocre at best. That kind of grade wouldn’t get you into the really good schools I have my fair share of 3-star reviews for all my books, and long ago come to terms with the fact that I am not in ANY place to judge what criteria total strangers apply to their review giving. The urge to hunt reviewers down one by one to get it out of them has long since died down. (I can not speak to the mysterious disappearances to those who have given me one or two start reviews.)

I joke, but here’s the hard truth I have come to learn: I have no business wondering what you think of me. Does it change my work? No. If I sat down and argued with you about it, would it change your review? Probably not. So where does that leave us?

For me, I’m just one guy writing one story, and thousands of people read it. What are the odds—even on a good day—that everyone’s going to love it? Not high, because people are all different. I was listening to The Nerdist Chris Hardwick talk about doing stand-up, and he said some night’s people laugh and other nights they don’t. Sometimes, he says, the comedian and certain audiences just don’t fit together.

Does that make my book bad? No. My reviews run from 1 to 5 stars, settling heavily on 3 and above. It’s the neurotic nature of authors (remember that from earlier?) that keep me hung up on the 1, 2, 3’s. Sometimes a book and reader aren’t the right fit, either and I’ve learned, that’s okay.

The best way to deal with it for me is a way you can practice right this second! Pick your most favoritest book in the world. Got it in your head? Good. Now go on Amazon and click on the 1-star reviews for your precious and read some of the commentary. I’ll wait…..

Laughable, right? The book you hold most sacred is that book someone else pisses all over. Has it made you hate your favorite book? No…? I didn’t think so. It’s that idea right there that I find terribly centering as a writer. It gives me something us author’s forget all the time—perspective.

Why do we forget that? Because we’re dreamers and weavers of lies. We spin a web of words and want to catch you in it like the hungry little spiders we are. And yes, there is a vanity in that. We are presenting our word babies to you. We’re holding them up for the world to see, hoping you ALL adore them, and when you don’t ALL run to give us 5-star reviews, yes, we die a little inside. I don’t say that for a pity round of good reviews. It is simply the nature of the beast. We want you to love us, but the hard truth is that what you think of us is truly none of our business.

I wish I could say I ignore the bad reviews. I can’t. The fact that someone might rage against my books is like holding that adorable word baby of yours up and having it punched in the face by a stranger. It hurts, but the longer you succeed as an author (ie: someone keeps paying you to write books), your skin learns to thicken. It’s why book five for me feels like I might be turning 18 or drinking age in writer years. I’m becoming an adult.

I’ve learned to let go and get a chuckle out of the poorly written ones. Hell, I agree with some of the better written one star reviews, which hopefully only lets me improve as a writer. But I have to keep reminding myself: what you think of my books is none of my business. I’d love you to love them, but there are so many x-factors out there the the mathematics of desiring that just don’t work out. And there’s a strange comfort that comes in accepting that and learning to let go.

So what CAN I control? Only the things I do know directly. Like the fact that many of my readers have taken the time to write and tell me that I’ve pulled them out of moments of hardship in their lives—the mother overwhelmed dealing with two autistic kids or the woman in the hospital who latched on to them for escape and comfort before her all too brief life came to an end. Those to me are the things that stick.

If I’ve amused you, gave you a single moment of escape, made you say “oh, cool!” or even just gave you an “average C” level of simple enjoyment … those are the things I’ve learned that matter, as they should: the strange communions that happen between myself and readers, whatever small differences those make.

Oh, 3-star reviews! I get you, but I don’t “get” you. Nor is it truly my place.


Thank you Stacia and Anton for sharing your thoughts.

You get 5 stars from us :D

And once again, a huge Thank You to Bitten By Paranormal Romance and WildAboutBones for creating this event and letting Paperback Dolls participate!

Check out all the 3-Star rating Event participants

 

Paperback Dolls is made up of women from different parts of the world, with different backgrounds, different tastes and beliefs that were brought together through a love of reading. We like to think of ourselves as a cyber version of "The View" that focuses on books, authors, and reading. We are proof positive that one common love can unite the most opposite of people and form lasting friendships that introduce other ways of life and perspectives to each other.
Paperback Dolls
View all posts by Paperback Dolls
s website

8 Comments »

  • SharonS says:

    great guest posts! I think there is a big difference between what the reviews think of 3 stars and what authors think of them.

  • Doll Day says:

    I agree 100% with both of these authors. Stars are confusing because they are subjective. I tend to compare star ratings to school grading scales like Mr. Strout but obviously not everyone does. *SHRUGS* So, simply stating my thoughts on books seems to be whet I feel most comfortable doing. Paperback Dolls gets grief about it and some people don’t even take the time to read our reviews because they lack the “quick fix” someone gets by scanning a review and thinking they know where we stand based by how many stars we gave someones work.

  • RK Charron says:

    Fascinating to read about the ratings from the author’s perspective.
    For myself, I only pay attention to reviewers to whom I really trust.
    And even then I go with my own gut to read, or not to read.
    :)
    Thank you to Stacia & Anton for participating!
    All the best,
    RK Charron

  • erinf1 says:

    Fabulous post! Thanks for sharing and I know that in this blog world, it’s so hard to express these kind of sentiment w/out being blasted for not allowing others “freedom of expression”. And there are enough “authors behaving badly” to see how these ratings/reviews can throw a sensitive soul over the edge. I totally see both of your points and views and as strictly a reader, I really appreciate all the hard work you’ve put into writing. Just b/c a story didn’t thrill me, doesn’t mean it wasn’t well written. I always keep that in mind and I’ve recommended books I didn’t necessarily like to others b/c I know they’d like it. Thanks again!

  • Believer9200 says:

    LOVE YOU BOTH!!!

    I’ve been following this closely for the last few months. And here are two more links that add to the fun, imho….

    According to Becca Hamilton, a blogger has been giving her 1 star reviews this week because she disagrees with Becca’s views on something else entirely.

    Rebecca Hamilton ‏ @InkMuse Why writers should never piss off other writers: ttp://www.amazon.com/review/R1YH0HXA9UX5T9/ref=cm_cr_pr_perm?ie=UTF8&ASIN=B00729GQ0A&nodeID=&tag=&linkCode= Gottah love a juicy, personal review like that one O.o

    But then you have this AMAZING rant from a writer who basically tears into every body and their mothers! http://www.christopher-priest.co.uk/journal/1077/hull-0-scunthorpe-3/

    Folks – take a breather!

    AS Lilith Saintcrow ‏@lilithsaintcrow said “Fuck polemics. Do your job by writing the best, truest story you can, and don’t punk out. That’s enough work for anyone.”

    AMEN!

  • Karen says:

    Another interesting post about ratings.
    On my blog a 3 doesn’t mean average at all. It means I really enjoyed it but there may be one or two issues that I had that kept it from getting a 4 but I try to point that out.
    I rated an author friends book a four on goodreads once and she thought I hated it until she read a few of my other reviews and realized that’s a very good rating from me. I rarely rate anything as perfect. I was surprised at her reaction because a 4 is a great rating in my eyes.
    I do agree when Stacia says there is a lower rating in a review but the reviewer only states what she/he loved. The review doesn’t end up making any sense compared to the rating. I won’t rely on that reviewer anyway though.
    I think we all feel awkward about reviews and ratings.
    It was kind of eye opening to see a different side to the topic.

  • Doll Suz says:

    Ahhhh, subjectivity makes my eyes twirl around in my head. One of my very favorites is logging into Goodreads and seeing all the people who have given a book that isn’t due to be released for at least a year a rating (usually five stars but sometimes less). I can’t fathom their system. Are they just showing support or intentionally trying to skew the ratings data? Are they telephone clairvoyants trying to market themselves by suggesting they know more about the book than the author who is still writing it?

    If you check my own system you’ll see there is no system at all. I got disgusted with trying to give cliff hanger books a fair shake and started giving them all one star ratings, no matter how good the rest of the book is. The only exception to that rule is if the cliff hanger is mentioned on the cover or in the description of the book. Otherwise, one star for an unfinished story. Of course, that’s a recent rule so a close examination would suggest otherwise. See? Subjectivity.

    In truth, who cares? Some folks will agree, some folks won’t, we all do our best, and then call it a day. Yes?

    Thanks to you both for speaking on this topic! So great to hear from folks we love to pilot our escapism ships!

  • Anton just made me laugh out loud this morning. Now I have to worry about my books getting into the right Ivy League schools. I thought it was just the kids I had to worry about now it’s the books too.

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.